MetaKnigel If the Rule is Broken–Break It.

26Jan/120

The Kangaroo Panopticon

Posted by Knigel

Buddha is Watching

Written by Knigel Holmes
 

Why do I like Park Chan-wook’s Korean film, Oldboy, you ask? Why, the reason I like Oldboy is because I long to punish my enemies. Not only do I want to tit their tat, but also to utterly annihilate their entire existence while ruining everything they love. If they love nothing? Then I want to give them love only to violate it while blossoming. My enemies should not only suffer physically, but should also endure every possible psychological torture procurable. I want my adversaries to be at the peak of their hopes before kicking down their sandcastles. Before you indignantly judge me, you must remember that when I say “I”, you know that it means “we”: for beneath all of our politeness, beneath all of our reservations, linger spiteful, vindictive thoughts. Speak for myself? No, I will speak for all of us.

Elucidating this idea, Russell Roberts, the director of Vancouver, Canada’s Shakespearian Bard on the Beach play, Titus Andronicus, defends the choice of using gratuitous fake blood instead of “arty-farty” red ribbons:

“We’re very inhuman, we human beings. I mean, look what’s happening in Afghanistan, in Baghdad, in Somalia. It has happened since day one. This is no more violent or horrible than what’s going on around the globe right now. Titus has been catalogued as a problem play, but I think that the problem—if there’s a problem—is that we don’t like to have that mirror put up to us.”

7Nov/117

Vegetarians: Don’t Be Bad Guests

Posted by Knigel

Shadow Jockey

The is a followup from my previous post: Confessions of a Vegan Meat-Eater

Written by Knigel Holmes

Eat what the locals eat. Eat the dog, pig, and cow. Eat the whale, seal, and urchin. Eat the scorpion, cockroach and larvae. Shun cultural arrogance, and instead of confining freedom to strict vegetarianism or religious food restrictions, open up to other cultures. Religion and moral righteousness are not valid excuses for not challenging one’s own cultural norms. Sharing food and participating in food culture is not simply a matter of politeness. No, breaking bread is a highly moral act because it brings cultures closer together. Rejecting food and generosity rejects the culture and is, therefore, a competing immoral act. The choice of vegetarianism, for example, is not inherently “right” or “wrong”, it is, however, mainly a decision from within more food secure nations and not ethically superior to the choice of an adaptive diet. Instead of alienating hosts, take part in local food culture, and consider temporarily relaxing dietary preferences.

Contrary to claims of moral superiority, the vegetarian diet is not inherently “good”. As far as we know, the diet is merely a preference among other ethical choices. Without evidence of a deity, we cannot claim to have any absolute wrong or right (Sinnott-Armstrong). Thus, our morality is human-centric. Beliefs of “right” and “wrong” stem from events that affect us as humans. For example, if given the choice between a fresh, ripe apple and a rotten, decomposing apple most would choose the fresh apple. Given that we have no evidence of an intrinsic morality, we can only design our own extrinsic morals. Since there is no certainty of one path of ethics, we can think of ethics in terms of moral landscapes with different peaks and drops. The moral landscape, says author Sam Harris, is:

25Oct/117

Confessions of a Vegan Meat-Eater

Posted by Knigel

Born a Prisoner

Written by Knigel Holmes

Twice have I been unable to defend my arguments for consuming meat. While I resisted at first, in the end, my opponents persuaded me into vegetarianism. They countered my points showing me how I either contradicted myself or used flippant comments to deflect. No single argument convinced me into abstaining from animal products; vegetarianism is a lifestyle built from diverse arguments including those of ethics, economics, and health. The arguments supporting vegetarianism are persuasive and rational; however, I will explain why, after being a vegetarian for so long, I not only murder and eat animals, but that my ethical choice withstands vegetarian righteousness and encourages me to eat less conventional animals—such as insects, octopuses, and dogs.

My first experiment with vegetarianism taught me esoteric knowledge giving me insight beyond the ignorant mainstream. My natural distrust for government and business helped me grasp vegetarian concepts and then apply them to my new worldview. Having researched in depth—not necessary before as an omnivore—I saw my choice as undoubtedly superior. Convinced meat-eaters either wilfully ignorant or lazy, I waited patiently—like a carnivorous plant—to entrap my prey. Ordering vegetarian dishes was enough to lure victims into engaging me in debate. I mauled; then digested the encounters—each giving me ferocity for future confrontations.

This first bout with vegetarianism lasted two years ending for the sake of living in Cuba. With The United States continuing an illegal economic embargo punishing the Cuban population, the Cuban government rations food so that no one starves; unfortunately, this does not ease the dearth of resources. A vegetarian diet was impractical—if not impossible—while living in the small Holguín barrio. Moreover, my Cuban host father, Manuel, challenged my animal rights ideology. Through ongoing dialogue, I realised that much of my vegetarian philosophy derived from first world luxuries that could not satisfactory compete with strife from those who endured the economic hardships during “the special period”. Cubans struggled for basic nutrition, and I implied that they were immoral for doing so. Despite my ethnocentricity, I kept my vegetarian philosophy. Instead of accepting meat consumption as moral, my discordance between belief and behaviour left me in cognitive dissonance.

10Dec/100

Animal Abuser, Catsaw, Kills Cats Claiming Animal Advocacy.

Posted by Knigel

WARNING!!! -- VERY GRAPHIC AND DISTURBING MATERIAL!!!
(Graphic pictures of animal abuse and letters of the abuser at the bottom of the post)

My Korean friend has filled me in on some recent disturbing news. Apparently, a Korean gentleman under the pseudonym, Catsaw, has been inspired by the gore flick, SAW. From what my friend says, Catsaw has been torturing cats and spreading riddles to netizens from Internet cafés.

I have not seen any of it in English yet; therefore, I believe that this news is worth mentioning. Before continuing, I understand that some people crave attention by breaking social taboos. This is a difficult matter when voluntarily spreading information that helps them in their cause. At the same time, I do not see that as a valid cause for self-censorship. While writing about someone's misdeeds may give them the very attention that they desire, the information may prove useful for other purposes. I hope that through debate, Catsaw and people with similar ideas can understand the mistakes of their reasoning. Through logical discourse, people may realise that what seemed like an intelligent and rational idea at first was not a worthwhile thought to put into action. Logic reveals irrational justifications for malformed deeds.

Underneath the images, Catsaw, the suspected animal abuser has written riddles in a similar format as Jigsaw from the movie series SAW. The riddles threaten that if people do not follow the requests of the letter, Catsaw will kill the feline hostages. Catsaw sets the stage by mentioning how people buy cats and then throw them away when the cat becomes boring.